As most of you are probably unaware of, starting on July 1st and running for a good three weeks straight is what cyclists consider to be “the superbowl” of cycling, or as it is more properly identified, the Tour de France. Now for any American, the Tour de France has traditionally been a source of pride. Our cycling hero,Lance Armstrong, kicked cancer’s ass and then went to France to win 7 consecutive Tour de France titles, which was not only sweet because he won the world’s greatest cycling competition, but more so because he embarrassed the French each and every time he did so.
In fact, the only other athletes who have embarrassed the French more are those comprising the Men’s 4X100 Freestlye Relay at the Beijing Olympics. Those men quite literally gave France the lead for 99% of the race only to snatch victory from French hands within the last hundredths of a second. In traditional American fashion, they also set a new world standard by swimming the fastest 100 Freestyle split ever to be recorded, just to make victory that much sweeter. But I digress, when Lance Armstrong announced that he was returning to cycling next year Americans everywhere were expecting another French ass whooping. Not only would he beat the French seven times in a row after beating cancer, but he would also beat them after retiring for a few years and aging past his prime, just to remind them how badass we Americans are.
Lance almost did it too, he got third place in his comeback tour behind Andy Schleck and the winner Alberto Contador who are not only the post Armstrong era’s best cyclists, but also some of the best cyclists of all time. While third place certainly wasn’t the ass whooping we Americans were looking for, Armstrong assured us that such a placing was only because he was priming himself for an even more epic ass whooping at this year’s tour.
For a while things looked good for Lance. He had better fitness starting off this year because he had participated in a variety of grand tours and other races from his comeback season, and if that wasn’t enough he even hired cycling’s most prolific (though questionable) sports scientists in Allen Lim. To put a cherry on top, Armstrong even formulated his “Team Radioshack” team, or “Team the Shack” team or whatever the hell they call Radio shack nowadays completely around him. He hired the best support cyclists possible and it made it very clear to them that their job was to ride for him to win. It seemed as if Armstrong was covering every angle in order to get every competitive edge to kickass this year, but like a really crappy white basketball player who also happens to be blind, Lance dropped the ball.
On the first stage Armstrong started off “well”. He got fourth overall in the prologue and was five seconds ahead of his arch-nemesis rival evil twin counterpart Alberto Contador. Now, in the months leading up to the tour every cycling publication built up the rivalry between Armstrong and Contador making it out to be the biggest clash of forces ever. Contador is currently the world’s top cyclist, and Lance Armstrong WAS the world’s top cyclist. It was the ultimate showdown, and of course the media analyzed every little bit of interaction between the two in order to perpetuate the rivalry as much as possible.
In fact on the day of the prologue, Bicycling magazine’s dedicated Lance Armstrong ass-kisser correspondent, Bill Strickland immediately decided to praise Armstrong for his minuscule lead over Contador, practically claiming him the victor by writing “But it’s the smallest time gap — the five seconds between Armstrong and last year’s winner, Contador — that has the biggest meaning.” Now I don’t know about anyone else, but five seconds isn’t a hell of a lot of time. That gap is literally the difference between taking a couple of sips of water or not, and in a race that lasts three weeks and goes throughout the country of France, five seconds does not have any meaning at all.
After that one initial prologue race, everything went down hill for Armstrong. He crashed in Stage 2, had an untimely puncture in Stage 3 and in the following stages his position in the overall standings slowly eroded lower and lower. Then came stage 8. Stage 8 was really the first climbing stage of the tour and as such, it was the stage when the men began to separate from the boys. As the pace of the peloton was about to ramp up on one of the major climbs, Armstrong fell after he clipped his pedal on a roundabout. Obediently his team dropped back to bring him up to pace only to have Armstrong nearly crash again and lose contact with the peloton. By the end of the day, Armstrong was 11 minutes behind the leaders and had virtually no shot of winning the tour.
As Bill Strickland wrote “The Tour hadn’t destroyed a champion like this since 1996. Back then, Miguel Indurain had won five Tours in a row (the first to ever achieve that many consecutively).” What baffles me is the fact that people seem to blame “the tour” for making Armstrong lose the race. Instead, why don’t we blame the person who actually lost the race, Lance Armstrong. With all of his Allen Lim thermodynamics probes, Chris Carmichael training, and tailored domestique team, Armstrong still managed to somehow screw up what could have been one of the greatest comebacks in cycling history. Now I understand that crashes and “mechanicals” happen in cycling, but that’s STILL NO EXCUSE for losing. For instance, wind, rain, heat, and snow all affect the game of football and they do change the course of the game. When a team loses in football on a particularly snowy day, they don’t blame it on the weather, they blame it on their inability to tailor their gameplay into an effective strategy given the weather conditions. Likewise, Armstrong didn’t lose because he crashed, he lost because he couldn’t recover and change his tactics even with one of cycling’s greatest support teams built around him. Quite frankly, if Armstrong let something as “commonplace” in cycling as a crash ruin his tour, then he didn’t even deserve to win in the first place.
Now what was great about this whole situation was the damage control that Bicycling’s Bill Strickland tried to put into place. At first he wrote about Lance’s new strategy which was to ride support for his team. Seeing as how Lance is kind of a prick, he decided against that. Instead he chose to get his ass handed to him on the following stages because he wanted to conserve his energy until he felt he could attack on a stage that he could win. This strategy totally sucked because Armstrong didn’t even win in the stage that he was making his main attack on, which in turn made his time loss in the overall standings a complete waste. Realizing that Armstrong had nothing left, Strickland tried to justify Armstrong’s suckiness by suggesting that it would be noble for Armstrong to actually finish last.
Armstrong should achieve the feat of not winning in a flamboyant, record-setting and controversial way that befits his legacy: He should summon his legendary willpower and sprint backward through the GC to become the first American Lanterne Rouge. I shit you not, apparently the French are so used to coming in last place at the Tour de France that they decided to make becoming last just as important as winning first. Not only is this logic in and of itself absolutely absurd, but for Strickland to suggest that the greatest and most accomplished cyclist in history finish last, is simply insulting.
Then of course on the final stage of the tour, after doing absolutely nothing for his team other than making them come back to save him time and time again, Armstrong made his team wear different jersey’s in order to market his Livestrong foundation. Now I’m all for supporting cancer awareness, and fighting against it, however changing jersey’s like that is against the rules and no matter how justified the action was, or what the reasons were behind changing them, it was still against the rules. Obviously, its a very silly rule but I’m the kind of person that believes rules should be followed out of respect for the people that put them in place. If your friend doesn’t like you to walk around with shoes inside his house, you take them off right at the door. Sure it’s stupid, but if you don’t do it, you’re just being a prick for no reason, and that’s exactly what Armstrong was being when he decided to make that decision.
At the end of the day, Lance’s tour sucked. He got into stupid crashes, made his team come save him time and time again like an abusive father who happens to be alcoholic pestering his sons to buy him beer just so he can get drunk and beat them again. Ultimately, he got his ass handed to him by his greatest nemesis rival in the universe, Alberto Contador. As always, in a post tour write-up Bill Strickland was quick to come to the rescue with some damage control. He wrote about all of the other cycling greats who eventually collapsed during the tour.
In 1986, the five-time winner Bernard Hinault went back on a promise to help his teammate Greg LeMond win the Tour (the year before, the clearly superior Lemond had sacrificed a certain victory to aid Hinault) and repeatedly attacked the American in the mountains, leading to one of the ugliest—thought greatest—Tours in history. When LeMond won, Hinault first claimed he’d ridden so aggressively and selfishly in order to wear down opponents, then later said he’d done so to ensure that everyone would have no doubt LeMond was worthy of the victory. That was his last Tour.
While it is nice that Strickland found like five examples of this, it still doesn’t justify or explain why Lance Armstrong lost. Lance Armstrong lost because he was entered in the race way past his prime, and I personally don’t think he trained up for it properly. In the weeks leading up to the tour Alberto Contador trained in the Pyreness mountains, and the cobbles of Paris Rouibax, all aspects of the tour that he needed to work on. What did Armstrong do? Enter a bunch of shitty races like the Tour of California, that stupid Gila race that doesn’t let you actually ride for your pro team, and a bunch of other weak sauce races. Of course to make up for this, Armstrong had super sports scientist Allen Lim to close the gap for his lack of training, but at the end of the day, Armstrong didn’t want to put in the hard work racing and training to win the tour, and it obviously showed when he got destroyed this year.
Better luck next year Lance, oh wait.