Jul
31
2010

On Lance “I suck at cycling” Armstong…

As most of you are prob­a­bly unaware of, start­ing on July 1st and run­ning for a good three weeks straight is what cyclists con­sider to be “the super­bowl” of cycling, or as it is more prop­erly iden­ti­fied, the Tour de France. Now for any Amer­i­can, the Tour de France has tra­di­tion­ally been a source of pride. Our cycling hero,Lance Arm­strong, kicked cancer’s ass and then went to France to win 7 con­sec­u­tive Tour de France titles, which was not only sweet because he won the world’s great­est cycling com­pe­ti­tion, but more so because he embar­rassed the French each and every time he did so.

In fact, the only other ath­letes who have embar­rassed the French more are those com­pris­ing the  Men’s 4X100 Freestlye Relay at the Bei­jing Olympics. Those men quite lit­er­ally gave France the lead for 99% of the race only to snatch vic­tory from French hands within the last hun­dredths of a sec­ond. In tra­di­tional Amer­i­can fash­ion, they also set a new world stan­dard by swim­ming the fastest 100 Freestyle split ever to be recorded, just to make vic­tory that much sweeter. But I digress, when Lance Arm­strong announced that he was return­ing to cycling next year Amer­i­cans every­where were expect­ing another French ass whoop­ing. Not only would he beat the French seven times in a row after beat­ing can­cer, but he would also beat them after retir­ing for a few years and aging past his prime, just to remind them how badass we Amer­i­cans are.

Lance almost did it too, he got third place in his come­back tour behind Andy Schleck and the win­ner Alberto Con­ta­dor who are not only the post Arm­strong era’s best cyclists, but also some of the best cyclists of all time. While third place cer­tainly wasn’t the ass whoop­ing we Amer­i­cans were look­ing for, Arm­strong assured us that such a plac­ing was only because he was prim­ing him­self for an even more epic ass whoop­ing at this year’s tour.

For a while things looked good for Lance. He had bet­ter fit­ness start­ing off this year because he had par­tic­i­pated in a vari­ety of grand tours and other races from his come­back sea­son, and if that wasn’t enough he even hired cycling’s most pro­lific (though ques­tion­able) sports sci­en­tists in Allen Lim. To put a cherry on top, Arm­strong even for­mu­lated his “Team Radioshack” team, or “Team the Shack” team or what­ever the hell they call Radio shack nowa­days com­pletely around him. He hired the best sup­port cyclists pos­si­ble and it made it very clear to them that their job was to ride for him to win. It seemed as if Arm­strong was cov­er­ing every angle in order to get every com­pet­i­tive edge to kick­ass this year,  but like a really crappy white bas­ket­ball player who also hap­pens to be blind, Lance dropped the ball.

On the first stage Arm­strong started off “well”. He got fourth over­all in the pro­logue and was five sec­onds ahead of his arch-nemesis rival evil twin coun­ter­part Alberto Con­ta­dor. Now, in the months lead­ing up to the tour every cycling pub­li­ca­tion built up the rivalry between Arm­strong and Con­ta­dor mak­ing it out to be the biggest clash of forces ever. Con­ta­dor is cur­rently the world’s top cyclist, and Lance Arm­strong WAS the world’s top cyclist.  It was the ulti­mate show­down, and of course the media ana­lyzed every lit­tle bit of inter­ac­tion between the two in order to per­pet­u­ate the rivalry as much as possible.

In fact on the day of the pro­logue, Bicy­cling magazine’s ded­i­cated Lance Arm­strong ass-kisser cor­re­spon­dent, Bill Strick­land imme­di­ately decided to praise Arm­strong for his minus­cule lead over Con­ta­dor, prac­ti­cally claim­ing him the vic­tor by writ­ing “But it’s the small­est time gap — the five sec­onds between Arm­strong and last year’s win­ner, Con­ta­dor — that has the biggest mean­ing.” Now I don’t know about any­one else, but five sec­onds isn’t a hell of a lot of time. That gap is lit­er­ally the dif­fer­ence between tak­ing a cou­ple of sips of water or not, and in a race that lasts three weeks and goes through­out the coun­try of France, five sec­onds does not have any mean­ing at all.

After that one ini­tial pro­logue race, every­thing went down hill for Arm­strong. He crashed in Stage 2, had an untimely punc­ture in Stage 3 and in the fol­low­ing stages his posi­tion in the over­all stand­ings slowly eroded lower and lower. Then came stage 8. Stage 8 was really the first climb­ing stage of the tour and as such, it was the stage when the men began to sep­a­rate from the boys. As the pace of the pelo­ton was about to ramp up on one of the major climbs, Arm­strong fell after he clipped his pedal on a round­about. Obe­di­ently his team dropped back to bring him up to pace only to have Arm­strong nearly crash again and lose con­tact with the pelo­ton. By the end of the day, Arm­strong was 11 min­utes behind the lead­ers and had vir­tu­ally no shot of win­ning the tour.

As Bill Strick­land wrote “The Tour hadn’t destroyed a cham­pion like this since 1996. Back then, Miguel Indurain had won five Tours in a row (the first to ever achieve that many con­sec­u­tively).” What baf­fles me is the fact that peo­ple seem to blame “the tour” for mak­ing Arm­strong lose the race. Instead, why don’t we blame the per­son who actu­ally lost the race, Lance Arm­strong. With all of his Allen Lim ther­mo­dy­nam­ics probes, Chris Carmichael train­ing, and tai­lored domes­tique team, Arm­strong still man­aged to some­how screw up what could have been one of the great­est come­backs in cycling his­tory. Now I under­stand that crashes and “mechan­i­cals” hap­pen in cycling, but that’s STILL NO EXCUSE for los­ing. For instance, wind, rain, heat, and snow all affect the game of foot­ball and they do change the course of the game. When a team loses in foot­ball on a par­tic­u­larly snowy day, they don’t blame it on the weather, they blame it on their inabil­ity to tai­lor their game­play into an effec­tive strat­egy given the weather con­di­tions. Like­wise, Arm­strong didn’t lose because he crashed, he lost because he couldn’t recover and change his tac­tics even with one of cycling’s great­est sup­port teams built around him. Quite frankly, if Arm­strong let some­thing as “com­mon­place” in cycling as a crash ruin his tour, then he didn’t even deserve to win in the first place.

Now what was great about this whole sit­u­a­tion was the dam­age con­trol that Bicycling’s Bill Strick­land tried to put into place. At first he wrote about Lance’s new strat­egy which was to  ride sup­port for his team. See­ing as how Lance is kind of a prick, he decided against that. Instead he chose to get his ass handed to him on the fol­low­ing stages because he wanted to con­serve his energy until he felt he could attack on a stage that he could win. This strat­egy totally sucked because Arm­strong didn’t even win in the stage that he was mak­ing his main attack on, which in turn made his time loss in the over­all stand­ings a com­plete waste. Real­iz­ing that Arm­strong had noth­ing left, Strick­land tried to jus­tify Armstrong’s suck­i­ness by sug­gest­ing that  it would be noble for Arm­strong  to actu­ally fin­ish last.

Arm­strong should achieve the feat of not win­ning in a flam­boy­ant, record-setting and con­tro­ver­sial way that befits his legacy: He should sum­mon his leg­endary willpower and sprint back­ward through the GC to become the first Amer­i­can Lanterne Rouge. I shit you not, appar­ently the French are so used to com­ing in last place at the Tour de France that they decided to make becom­ing last just as impor­tant as win­ning first. Not only is this logic in and of itself absolutely absurd, but for Strick­land to sug­gest that the great­est and most accom­plished cyclist in his­tory fin­ish last, is sim­ply insulting.

Then of course on the final stage of the tour, after doing absolutely noth­ing for his team other than mak­ing them come back to save him time and time again, Arm­strong made his team wear dif­fer­ent jersey’s in order to mar­ket his Live­strong foun­da­tion. Now I’m all for sup­port­ing can­cer aware­ness, and fight­ing against it, how­ever chang­ing jersey’s like that is against the rules and no mat­ter how jus­ti­fied the action was, or what the rea­sons were behind chang­ing them, it was still against the rules. Obvi­ously, its a very silly rule but I’m the kind of per­son that believes rules should be fol­lowed out of respect for the peo­ple that put them in place. If your friend doesn’t like you to walk around with shoes inside his house, you take them off right at the door. Sure it’s stu­pid, but if you don’t do it, you’re just being a prick for no rea­son, and that’s exactly what Arm­strong was being when he decided to make that decision.

At the end of the day, Lance’s tour sucked. He got into stu­pid crashes, made his team come save him time and time again like an abu­sive father who hap­pens to be alco­holic pes­ter­ing his sons to buy him beer just so he can get drunk and beat them again. Ulti­mately, he got his ass handed to him by his great­est neme­sis rival in the uni­verse, Alberto Con­ta­dor. As always, in a post tour write-up Bill Strick­land was quick to come to the res­cue with some dam­age con­trol. He wrote about all of the other cycling greats who even­tu­ally col­lapsed dur­ing the tour.

In 1986, the five-time win­ner Bernard Hin­ault went back on a promise to help his team­mate Greg LeMond win the Tour (the year before, the clearly supe­rior Lemond had sac­ri­ficed a cer­tain vic­tory to aid Hin­ault) and repeat­edly attacked the Amer­i­can in the moun­tains, lead­ing to one of the ugliest—thought greatest—Tours in his­tory. When LeMond won, Hin­ault first claimed he’d rid­den so aggres­sively and self­ishly in order to wear down oppo­nents, then later said he’d done so to ensure that every­one would have no doubt LeMond was wor­thy of the vic­tory. That was his last Tour.

While it is nice that Strick­land found like five exam­ples of this, it still doesn’t jus­tify or explain why Lance Arm­strong lost. Lance Arm­strong lost because he was entered in the race way past his prime, and I per­son­ally don’t think he trained up for it prop­erly. In the weeks lead­ing up to the tour Alberto Con­ta­dor trained in the Pyre­ness moun­tains, and the cob­bles of Paris Rouibax, all aspects of the tour that he needed to work on. What did Arm­strong do? Enter a bunch of shitty races like the Tour of Cal­i­for­nia, that stu­pid Gila race that doesn’t let you actu­ally ride for your pro team, and a bunch of other weak sauce races. Of course to make up for this, Arm­strong had super sports sci­en­tist Allen Lim to close the gap for his lack of train­ing, but at the end of the day, Arm­strong didn’t want to put in the hard work rac­ing and train­ing to win the tour, and it obvi­ously showed when he got destroyed this year.

Bet­ter luck next year Lance, oh wait.

Apr
07
2010

Me and the Tires From Hell…

As a long­time writer and cura­tor of this web­site, I have always been under the impres­sion that this site has had a total of three read­ers. The first is of course myself, the sec­ond is Alex Guichet (who has this site demon­i­cally imbued with the evil dark shadow gods of twit­ter so he can see when­ever I make a post), and the last of which is Owen Kue­merle, who likes to leave the occa­sional com­ment on the site, write lengthy posts on his own site crit­i­ciz­ing my movies, and who attempts to “update” my theme from time to time but fails mis­er­ably even though he is a com­puter sci­ence major in col­lege. While I was per­fectly sat­is­fied with cap­tur­ing the atten­tion of these three two read­ers with my end­less rants on cycling, movies, soci­ety, etc, it appears as if my fiery prose and witty dic­tion has cap­tured the atten­tion of an unprece­dented fourth third reader, An Nguyen.

Now An is spe­cial for three rea­sons. One, her name is short, easy to spell, and rhymes with the word an. Two, she’s the smartest per­son at Mater Dei and is one of the fabled few to make it into UCLA. Lastly, she is a female which is a huge gain for the web­site con­sid­er­ing my shame­less chau­vin­is­tic behav­ior, and my com­pul­sory demand that every female in exis­tence make me a sand­wich. An’s read­er­ship shows that the site is really hit­ting some unsus­pected demo­graph­ics, and that my writ­ing is really reach­ing out and touch­ing the hearts of more than just the two guys that pay for and main­tain this web­site. But I digress, hav­ing a female read this site isn’t always a good thing. Like most females, An likes to go and make com­ments that are absolutely ridicu­lous. One time she remarked how my use of to word “Where”  was inap­pro­pri­ate, insin­u­at­ing that “Where” should have been switched out for the word “Were”, because “Where” sig­ni­fies a loca­tion of some­thing, whereas “Were” sig­ni­fies some­thing that occurred in the past. Another time, An remarked “it seems like you get a lot of flat tires when you ride your bike”, to which I responded, “Yeah, because I actu­ally do”. Now know­ing how females works, An’s com­ment about my flat tires wasn’t just a sim­ple off the cuff com­ment in the midst of a con­ver­sa­tion, no, it was a care­fully crafted and metic­u­lously con­structed  time bomb which she embed­ded within my brain in order to launch a men­tal ter­ror­ist attack when the time was right. Yes­ter­day, An’s men­tal IED-timebomb-suicide bomber-jihad– finally went off when I received yet another flat tire.

The day started off absolutely per­fect. The weather was clear and crisp, in the mid sev­en­ties, the sun was bright, and my legs were feel­ing good ( note the proper usage of the word “were”). Because it was such a nice day, I decided to try some­thing unprece­dented in my bike rid­ing rou­tine, I attempted to inte­grate two major climbs into my ride. The first climb was the one up Jam­boree, which I elab­o­rated on in my pre­vi­ous post about cycling, and the sec­ond climb was about five miles east, down Por­tola, which is a climb that I usu­ally tackle when I choose to ride “the hilly route”. Now I knew inte­grat­ing both climbs into my ride would be chal­leng­ing because my rid­ing and gen­eral level of fit­ness has been incon­sis­tent due to the spring break and Easter fes­tiv­i­ties. How­ever, I also knew that I badly needed the chal­lenge of two climbs to keep my car­dio­vas­cu­lar sys­tem in shape for swim­ming, and thus I had no choice but to accept the challenge.

The first climb up Jam­boree was chal­leng­ing, but suc­cess­ful. I trailed what looked like an expe­ri­enced 30+ year old cyclist for the base miles of the climb, but once we hit the first major descent, I noticed that he was using the smaller ring. Because I absolutely hate every­one that uses the smaller ring when rid­ing a bike, I felt the need to emas­cu­late this cyclist, and thus I took off  and passed him using my supe­rior larger ring for the entirety of the climb. My legs where burn­ing, and my heart was pump­ing as I made the Jam­boree climb, but I was hold­ing a solid 14MPH which felt light­ning fast com­pared to the 8MPH that I had in the severe wind­storm a week prior. I turned around, made my descent, and headed down Por­tola to tackle the sec­ond of the day’s climb.

Por­tola is a beau­ti­ful road, in fact it’s so beau­ti­ful that I used it for the cycling shot in my Chap­man Appli­ca­tion. How­ever, it’s also a road that is dif­fi­cult to gauge one’s speed on. It’s hilly, bumpy, and some­times sus­cep­ti­ble to the wind, which means that it’s hard to tell whether one’s going fast because they’re in good shape, or if they’re going fast because they hap­pen to be rid­ing down a hill. Like­wise, it’s also hard to tell whether one is going slow because they are out of shape or are tired, or whether they just are going slow because they hit a bumpy patch of road, a small climb, and a gust of wind. I hap­pened to be on the slow side of the spec­trum, and thus found it frus­trat­ing that I was exert­ing a lot of energy to still travel rel­a­tively slow down Por­tola. The good thing was that I was get­ting a great work­out, and that my heart was pump­ing, but as a cyclist I gen­er­ally pre­fer to go fast with the least amount of per­ceived effort exerted.

I hit the climb at the end of Por­tola and did sur­pris­ingly well. I rode the base of the climb at a solid 17 MPH, and even­tu­ally declined to a steady 13-14MPH as the climb got steeper. I reached the top of the climb and was instantly relieved that the dif­fi­cult por­tion of my ride was over. Every­thing was quite lit­er­ally down hill from the top of the climb, all the way back to home, and thus I looked for­ward to cruis­ing for the remain­der of my ride. More than that though, I also felt accom­plished. I had tack­led two of the biggest climbs in my imme­di­ate area, with rel­a­tively strong form, and thus I decided to make my route a sta­ple of my rid­ing cat­a­log. I called the route  the “Great McNally Transverse”.

Because both the City of Irvine and the City of Tustin suck, I noticed a large amount of road con­struc­tion through­out the ride. Two lanes, plus the bike lane were closed off at the start of my ride which made rid­ing to the trail pretty scary, as cars where try­ing to kill me. The bike lane was also closed on the descent down Por­tola because the City of Irvine believed that one of its newest roads in its least pop­u­lated area needed re-pavement even though hardly any­one trav­els down it because it leads to nowhere.  Know­ing that such road work was tak­ing place, I decided to use an alter­nate route in order to avoid the hos­tile cars that would inevitably try to kill me. How­ever, I had to think twice about using the alter­nate route because I once got a mas­sive tire punc­ture from choos­ing it months prior, so I promised myself that I would keep a close eye out for erro­neous bike debris that could cause a flat.

Thus I made my way home, mak­ing great time, and bask­ing in the accom­plish­ment of com­plet­ing the first ever “Great McNally Trans­verse”, all I had left to do was to com­plete the last few miles of the 30 mile route. About five miles away from home, I began to feel a weird bump­ing in my rear wheel. At first I thought it was the pave­ment, but then I noticed that it got worse, and as it got worse, I got slower. I knew imme­di­ately that I had another flat tire. I stopped at a nearby side­walk and felt the rear tire notic­ing that it was quickly leak­ing air. Being so close to home, I decided to call my brother, because it wasn’t worth wast­ing a CO2 car­tridge five miles away from home. My brother agreed to pick me up, and as I waited, I began fum­ing with hatred for my bike’s tires. They had allowed flat, after flat, after flat and this was only my 47th mile since chang­ing out the tube from a pre­vi­ous flat. This flat tire had ruined the great accom­plish­ment of com­plet­ing the “Great McNally Trans­verse” and it would inevitably cost me more time and money in the way of buy­ing tubes, wait­ing to be picked up, and hav­ing to repair the tire.

I got home and imme­di­ately decided to change my tires. I con­sulted var­i­ous bicy­cling forums, and con­cluded that I needed to pur­chase a pair of Con­ti­nen­tal GP 4000’s. These tires had a whole slew of tech­nolo­gies for pre­vent­ing flats, and best of all, they where a high per­for­mance race tire that a lot of pros used. The only prob­lem that they had was the fact that a pair of them cost upwards of $120, and while I am usu­ally the first per­son to put down $120 for any­thing bike related, espe­cially if it’s going to pre­vent the dreaded “flat tire”, I didn’t believe that putting down so much money was jus­ti­fied unless I had tried and failed at an alter­na­tive solu­tion. So I descended to the depths of my garage to look for an alter­na­tive solu­tion and for­tu­nately for me, I had found one.

My dad’s old road bike, which still suf­fered from chronic blow out prob­lems despite my attempts to repair it, had a pair of 25MM Con­ti­nen­tal Race Ultra’s that were still in good con­di­tion. Iron­i­cally, while every­thing about my Dad’s old bike was bad, it was slow, had trou­ble shift­ing prop­erly, had bad ride char­ac­ter­is­tics and han­dling, the one thing that it did have going for it was the fact that it never got flat tires. This is espe­cially impres­sive con­sid­er­ing the fact that the wheels weren’t true, which means that if any­thing, the bike should have been espe­cially prone to flat tires. I con­cluded that the tires were the rea­son for the bike’s great track record with flats (400 miles with­out a flat), and I fig­ured if those tires could pre­vent flats on an old bike with ter­ri­ble wheels, they could def­i­nitely pre­vent flats on a new bike with great wheels.

Now I had mostly given up on try­ing to fix my Dad’s old road­bike. I spent a lot of time and money try­ing to fix it, and at the end of the day, the front wheel still kept pop­ping. What really pre­vented me from attempt­ing to do any­thing else to fix it, was the fact that the Con­ti­nen­tal Ultra Race tires were an absolute pain to mount. I spent three days straight try­ing to mount the tires. I did every­thing from pulling on them in order stretch them, to leav­ing them out in the sun in order soften the rub­ber, but despite my efforts the damn tires wouldn’t mount to the rim. One day, after half an hour of metic­u­lously using my mom’s blow dryer to soften the rub­ber, I some­how man­aged to pop the Con­ti­nen­tal Ultra Race tires onto the old rim. Excited at the prospect of fix­ing my Dad’s old bike, I mounted the wheel onto the frame and  hur­riedly pumped it up, only to have it pop on me again. After that instance, I had vowed to never again touch my Dad’s old road­bike because I had con­cluded that if the tires were that hard to mount then the damn bike just didn’t want to be fixed

How­ever, I real­ized that my Dad’s old road­bike had some­thing to offer me, and that I had some­thing I could offer it. I needed the old roadbike’s Con­ti­nen­tal Race Ultra’s, while my Dad’s old road­bike needed the crappy Vit­tora Rubino Proslick tires that my new bike had. The Proslicks where prob­a­bly the eas­i­est tires in the world to mount, and I could often use my hands to mount them to my roadbike’s rim. Whereas the Con­ti­nen­tal Ultras where a pain in the ass to mount (hence the exten­sive use of a blow dryer, and three days time, to get them onto the old roadbike’s rims). If I gave the old roabike my Rubino Proslicks, I could prob­a­bly mount them to the old bike’s rims, which in turn would give the bike another shot at being saved. Like­wise, if the old road­bike gave me the Con­ti­nen­tal Ultra’s, I had a chance at sav­ing myself $120 on new tires.

Thus, I went about swap­ping a great deal of tires. First I took the front Con­ti­nen­tal Ultra tire off of my Dad’s old road­bike, and mounted it onto my new roadbike’s rim. Sur­pris­ingly, the Con­ti­nen­tal Ultra slipped right onto the new rim with­out too much trou­ble, and I was actu­ally really relieved that I didn’t have to man­han­dle the tire like I did when I was try­ing to get it onto my Dad’s old rim. I then put the Rubino Pro Slick on the front tire of my Dad’s old bike, but sur­pris­ingly, the tire was hav­ing a hard time mount­ing to the rims. Frus­trated, I decided just to leave the Rubino Pro Slick, par­tially mounted, vow­ing to com­pletely mount it, after I had got­ten the Con­ti­nen­tal Ultras onto my new bike. I then took the Con­ti­nen­tal Ultra from the old roadbike’s rear wheel, and I mounted it onto the front wheel of my new bike. This was actu­ally really emo­tional because the front wheel of my new bike had sur­vived 1000 miles with­out hav­ing a flat, and thus, I felt like I was tak­ing it out of the game before it was ready to retire. How­ever, it was some­thing that had to be done because hav­ing two tires that don’t match is pretty ghetto. The Con­ti­nen­tal Ultra slipped onto the new rim pretty eas­ily, and I began to pump up both of my newly mounted tires in order to give them a test ride.

As I was pump­ing up the rear tire, I noticed a mas­sive bulge per­me­at­ing from the side wall of the tire. If I kept pump­ing up the tire, I was con­fi­dent that it would blow, and thus I slowly, and cau­tiously released the air from the tire in order to save the tube from pop­ping. Upon closer exam­i­na­tion, it appeared as if a cut in the side wall of the tire was allow­ing the tube to slip out through the side, which in turn would inevitably cause a blowout due to the bulging tube either hit­ting the break pads as it spun, or the side wall cut pinch­ing the bulging tube as more pres­sure was applied to it. I imme­di­ately real­ized that it was the tire caus­ing all of the blowouts on the front wheel of my Dad’s old bike, not an exposed spoke like I had pre­vi­ously thought. Real­iz­ing that I had found the solu­tion to fix­ing my Dad’s old road­bike, I imme­di­ately mounted the Rubino Pro Slick to the rim of my Dad’s old road­bike, and I pumped it up to about 100PSI. To my glee, the front wheel did not pop, mean­ing that I had essen­tially fixed my Dad’s old roadbike.

How­ever, I still wasn’t done with my tire woes. The Con­ti­nen­tal Ultra on the rear wheel of my new bike needed to be replaced, and tech­ni­cally my Dad’s old road­bike still needed new tires because the Rubino Pro Slicks would be espe­cially prone to flats  on those old, untrue wheels. So I decided to take a trip to my favorite place in the world, my local REI, in order to buy a new Con­ti­nen­tal Ultra tire, and a new tube to replace the one that was lost in the flat that I had incurred rid­ing the “Great McNally Tran­se­v­erse”. I con­cluded that if the Con­ti­nen­tal Ultra’s didn’t give me the flat pro­tec­tion that I needed, I would put them back on my Dad’s old road­bike, and buy a pair of GP 4000’s. If they did pro­vide me with the pro­tec­tion that I needed, then I would just leave them on my new bike, and buy a pair of punc­ture resis­tant tires for my Dad’s old road­bike when I took it into REI to get the wheels trued.

I attempted to mount the new Con­ti­nen­tal Ultra onto the rear wheel of the new bike, and imme­di­ately bad mem­o­ries began to hit me. Because the tires were new, the rub­ber hadn’t stretched at all, which in turn made them a pain in the ass to mount. Fur­ther­more, my thumbs had blis­ters from mount­ing, remov­ing, and remount­ing tires about eight times through­out the course of the day, which made mount­ing the Con­ti­nen­tal Ultra a lit­er­ally painful expe­ri­ence. After about an hour of try­ing to mount the new Con­ti­nen­tal Ultra,  my fore­arms, and fin­gers where tired, my patience  was at its end, and yet, the damn thing still wasn’t on the rim. I con­tem­plated giv­ing up and wait­ing until the next day to mount them, but I promised myself that I wouldn’t rest until I had at least one bike that was ride-able, and see­ing as how my Dad’s old bike was still miss­ing a tire on the rear wheel, it meant that I had to make my new road­bike ride-able. I took the tire into the house and used a secret weapon for mount­ing tires, my mom’s blow dryer. After a cou­ple of min­utes of using the blow dryer, and hav­ing both of my thumbs’ blis­ters pop in the process, I got the tire onto the rim. I mounted the wheel to my new road­bike, pumped it up, and promptly went back into my house to go to sleep. I was done with bikes for the day.

I still haven’t rid­den my bike with the new tires on it. It’s a par­tic­u­larly windy day, and my thumbs and fin­gers are so sore from work­ing with tires so much yes­ter­day that they are reluc­tant to touch any­thing bike related at the moment. While this process was phys­i­cally painful, and time con­sum­ing, it yielded a great merit. I learned a ton about bike tires, and I am now con­fi­dent that I can mount a tire in my sleep. I also res­ur­rected my Dad’s old road­bike, which is some­thing that I plan to use in col­lege, so I am really excited about that as well. After read­ing all of this, my three read­ers are prob­a­bly won­der­ing what the moral of this story was. While I sure a lot of mean­ings can be derived from such a lengthy post, I think the main mes­sage of this post can be summed up with the state­ment  “Don’t Lie.”

Apr
02
2010

I’m a Changed Cyclist…

I apol­o­gize because it’s been awhile since I last made a post. I actu­ally meant to make this post last Sun­day when the expe­ri­ence was still fresh in my head but the rig­ors of an upcom­ing Eng­lish paper, and of course swim prac­tice, made me think twice about stay­ing up until 12 to write a blog post. Regard­less, a lot has hap­pened to me cycling wise and I think it’ll be nice to explain how my out­look on cycling has changed with this post.

Because the swim sea­son is now in full swing, I haven’t had as much time to get on my bike. For me, this has been hard to grap­ple with. On one hand, the train­ing and psy­cho­log­i­cal ben­e­fits that cycling offers trans­lates really well into swim­ming,  plus I just straight up enjoy rid­ing my bike. But on the other hand, stay­ing off of the bike also ben­e­fits me by grant­ing the phys­i­o­log­i­cal rest that I need to recover from a long week of swim­ming and it also spares me the inevitable embar­rass­ment of get­ting another flat tire after rid­ing only a few hun­dred miles on a pre­vi­ously replaced tube. Because of this, I have approached bike rid­ing a lot dif­fer­ently than I approached it in the past. Instead of wor­ry­ing about dis­tance, I’ve decided to focus on inten­sity, choos­ing only to ride “the hilly route” and hop­ing to avoid get­ting any addi­tional flats in the process of doing so. I’ve also turned towards focus­ing more so on tech­nique which means train­ing with one pedal inter­vals, and low gears to help improve my ped­al­ing form.

In the name of improv­ing my fit­ness and over­all tech­nique, this past Sat­ur­day I decided to take “the hilly route” up to one of the most dif­fi­cult climbs in my area, Jam­boree Road. Jam­boree Road is actu­ally one of the best roads to ride a bike on, it has bike lanes, beau­ti­ful scenery, and most impor­tantly hills, but what makes the ride so great is the fact that it’s very chal­leng­ing. The road starts off with a fairly mild gra­di­ent, which makes it great for pick­ing up speed, but a few miles down the road there’s an incred­i­bly steep climb that lasts for what feels like half a mile, and then an even longer and steeper climb that imme­di­ately fol­lows that. After reach­ing the top of these climbs, rid­ers can choose to go down what I con­sider the most chal­leng­ing cycling route that I’ve rid­den on, San­ti­ago Canyon Road, or they can turn back around and enjoy some fun on some really long descents.

On this par­tic­u­lar Sat­ur­day, I decided to do the later because I was meet­ing with my fam­ily at the local Cor­ner Bak­ery for break­fast. The ride started out like most of my usual rides, I went up north along my local bike trail and then planned to join Jam­boree road once the trail ended. How­ever, towards the end of the trail it felt like I was mak­ing rel­a­tively slow time, and it felt very dif­fi­cult for me to climb the mild gra­di­ent that is found at the end of the trail. I imme­di­ately real­ized that it was because huge gusts of winds were pick­ing up, which in turn was mak­ing it tough for me to pedal. Now peo­ple who aren’t cyclist usu­ally don’t notice or even mind when its windy, but for many cyclists (me included), it’s the bane of my exis­tence. Wind makes rid­ers feel slower, makes it harder to pedal, and in gen­eral just makes things dif­fi­cult and uncom­fort­able. On the plus side, rid­ing in the the wind is a good train­ing tool and any rider who can hold his own in the wind is one that needs to be admired, but on this par­tic­u­lar day, I just didn’t feel like bat­tling the elements.

As I slowly reached the end of the trail, the ques­tion came as to whether I should join up with Jam­boree, or sim­ply turn around and meet up with the fam­ily for break­fast. Given the wind, I imme­di­ately wanted to do the later, but I also knew that I didn’t want to be known for being TOO much of a fair weather cyclist, and so I decided to go for the chal­lenge of climb­ing up Jam­boree. I made way onto the first cou­ple miles of Jamboree’s mild gra­di­ent and instantly felt how bad the wind was. I usu­ally aver­age about 20 MPH down that stretch of road, but on that par­tic­u­lar Sat­ur­day I was doing my best to hold 14 MPH, and that was before the climbs. I hit the fist climb, and imme­di­ately shifted to the sec­ond low­est gear pos­si­ble. Even though I was in such a low gear, the shear inten­sity of the wind, and the steep­ness of the hill made it nearly impos­si­ble for me to pedal. I aver­aged less than 8MPH and was on the verge of tip­ping over due to the low cadence that I was ped­al­ing at. I knew I had to do some­thing to make the climb eas­ier, or else I risked top­pling over or hav­ing to stop due to fatigue, and so I decided to do some­thing that I never do when I ride my bike, switch over to the small ring. For me, using the small ring is the ulti­mate mark of being a sissy when rid­ing a bike. Most bikes nowa­days have around 18 speeds, and they are usu­ally sep­a­rated with 9 speeds on the big ring and 9 speeds on the small ring. On the big ring  3 of the low­est gears are ridicu­lously easy, 2 of the high­est gears are pretty hard, and the rest are prac­ti­cal for every day rid­ing. On the small ring though, every­thing is easy and only some­body who has absolutely no fit­ness or leg strength chooses to ride on it for nor­mal use.

Because I was in a bit of an extreme sit­u­a­tion though, for the first time in my year long tenure as cyclist, I felt that the ridicu­lously easy gear ratios of the small ring where nec­es­sary, and thus I shifted down into it. The shift itself was hor­ri­ble, the small ring  took a lot of ten­sion off of the chain which made the bike really loud to pedal with, plus it didn’t feel as if the small ring was grip­ping prop­erly. How­ever, the small ring did allow me to pick up my cadence, which in turn helped me con­quer the first climb. By the time the sec­ond climb was approach­ing, things were get­ting really bad with the wind. Bru­tal gusts were hit­ting me harder than ever, and about half way through the sec­ond climb, one gust was so vio­lent that it nearly top­pled me and a cyclist in front of me over. At this point, I was pretty scared. I had never expe­ri­enced such dan­ger­ous con­di­tions while on a bike, and given my fatigue, I wasn’t sure if I was going to make it all the way up Jam­boree. I just kept say­ing to myself “Come on God, come on God” until I even­tu­ally made it over that sec­ond climb. On the ini­tial descent before the point in which I usu­ally turn around, I shifted back up the big ring, and was imme­di­ately relieved at how smooth and pow­er­ful the ped­als felt in com­par­i­son to the crappy small ring that I was forced to use. I was exhausted and the wind was still pretty bad, but know­ing that I all I had was an easy descent until I reached the Cor­ner Bak­ery, my adren­a­line kicked in, and I flew down Jam­boree. I aver­aged about 35MPH with­out even ped­al­ing due to the fact that the wind was so strong, and I kept my eyes fixed and focused on the road in front of me. The last thing I needed was to get a flat tire at 35MPH and with ridicu­lously fast winds. By the time Jam­boree lev­eled off, I was still cruis­ing at 30MPH due to the fact that I was ped­al­ing in my largest gear, I wasn’t bat­tling a hill, and adren­a­line was still surg­ing through­out my body.

By the time I reached the Cor­ner Bak­ery, I was as happy as I could pos­si­bly be. I had pushed myself, I over­came a great chal­lenge, and I ulti­mately made it home safely, there’s sim­ply not much more that I could ask out of a bike ride. But on top of that, I came away from that bike ride feel­ing changed. I hon­estly don’t know what it is that changed within me, but I feel as if I am ready to con­front more chal­lenges and push myself harder than I ever have before. I feel fear­less, and sub­se­quently I feel as if a lot of the things that I used to stress about in my life no longer mat­ter as much as they used to. I don’t know if this change is for bet­ter or for worse, but it def­i­nitely happened.

  • You are currently browsing the archives for the Cycling category.